So like many of you, I am in the process of putting together my abstracts for IAFN, but I could use some input here. I’m trying to identify content that people think is advanced when it comes to courtroom testimony. I’ll probably always submit content around the basics, but I really struggle with what a truly advanced session looks like (and how to implement it in an interactive way). I know what *I* think is advanced, but that may not resonate with everyone. In the interest of trying to meet the needs of the field, my smarty-pants wife suggested I crowdsource this dilemma. A fine idea–please share your thoughts in the comments, or via Twitter or email. And don’t be surprised if I reach out to some of you about your ideas–I may need to tap into the collective brain trust to get this one on point.